Arteries

I was in London on Wednesday, went to the National Gallery and then to see a play, Fram, by the poet Tony Harrison — an intelligent, irreverent, often very funny look at the role of poetry in society – does it have the power to change the way we think, particularly about big issues…well if the audience was anything to go by then the answer is a loud, seatsqueaking no. It was composed of the sort of theatre patrons who go because it’s theeearrrr-t, not for any love of poetry, that was apparent by their restlessness and failure to recognise the humour and cleverness in the writing. Oh well, at least they go.
But back to the National, I spent about two hours walking the gallery’s timeline, 1200 to 1900, and it was a strange experience, religious art and patron’s portraits, many of which seem to me to have a place based on having survived rather than any intrinsic value, brushstroked away by the impressionists, okay that’s a little simplistic in terms of art history, but as you walk through this monumental space, marble floors, vaulted ceilings, hallowed lighting, you suddenly find yourself in front of Monet’s Irises and the fluorescent light goes on: you’re staring at a canvas that for me perfectly embodies that shift, is almost a matrix of the genre, for though I’ve always loved impressionist art, I’ve tended to dismiss them as a little too pretty pretty, not enough fire, but seeing them in context I realised how revolutionary they were, major movers and shakers.
I left and walked out into a crazy rainstorm and was glad for once to be swallowed by the underground at rush hour, strange though it was to be back in the pushshove of tired, aggressive people breathing into your face, noses millimetres from early evening armpits hanging from ceiling straps, nobody making eye contact, the opposite of intimate which ironically is distant. From Waterloo we walked along the South Bank in the rain, the sky lightening, wet paving stones silvered, like the river was seeping through the city’s defences. London’s an amazing city, the architecture, the arts and running through it, a beautiful artery.

Tags: , , , , , ,

13 Responses to “Arteries”

  1. Paul Says:

    art ery, cool,

  2. Rose Dewy Knickers Says:

    Hi Jo,

    Thanks for the poetry tour of London. I can picture the places now and I hope to return someday.

    Rose

    xo

  3. Peter Says:

    I think I know what you are talking about. I was in the Louvre a couple weeks ago, and while many of the Greek, Roman and Etruscan sculptures were impressive, many of the 14th through 17th century paintings just seemed to me childish — I far prefered the 19th and 20th century paintings, particularly Van Gogh, Renoir and Cezanne.

    I had a strange thought at one point though, I was staring at the smooth marble foot of a Greek sculpture and musing on how strange toes look, and also beautiful and felt deeply impressed with wonder, and then I looked at the opened toed shoe of the girl I was with and did not feel the same wonder — so why is it that art makes us appreciate reality more than reality does?

  4. johemmant Says:

    Funny you should cite Cezanne, he is my favourite of them, his ability to capture light blows me away; yes, childish, simplistic, then you hit the mid-nineteenth century and there is this opening out of form, of colour, light, and by choosing new subjects and then by breaking them down and recreating them, they offer us something more beautiful than the ‘thing itself’.
    As so to your marble toe…….humans are fundamentally mundane, even the most wondrous have only moments of luminosity, art is always its own essence, if that makes sense. Maybe when the subject (landscape, figure, etc) becomes object a distance is created, and in that space/remove you can admire without fear of it changing, a little Petrachan? Or that’s my cobbled together take on it anyway.
    ps Hello Rosie (kiss)

  5. paisley Says:

    thank you for taking me with you… i probably will never see it,, but that doesn’t mean i cannot live it thru you……

  6. lissa Says:

    yess thanks for the imagery. i think i’m going to check out some of harrison’s work. hopefully, i’ll get it.

  7. dale Says:

    Huh. No representation or refraction of the human body moves me as the body itself does. Guess that’s why I do what I do :->

  8. johemmant Says:

    Thanks Paisley, maybe you’ll get here one day. Hi Lissa, yep he’s very dry and funny and bawdy.

    Oh don’t get me wrong, Dale, I know where you’re coming from too but I also relate to what Peter is saying…….like a Modigliani, I love his work and to look at one of his portraits moves me more than a human face in a crowd or someone I’m talking to, a face is a face is a face (shrug), a toe a toe. I think an artist can take the ordinary and make it extraordinary. But if I’m attracted to someone then I love to look, then a toe is a wonderful thing, it is different :)

  9. mariacristina Says:

    I love the contrast between the gallery and Monet’s irises to eye-level armpits on the subway! Woosh. Your day sounds full and productive, artwise and peoplewise.

    I like the lesser know impressionists: Bonnard, Vuillard. They painted intimate moments in time, almost like remembering a dream. And of course Monet.

    The only one I find too prettyfied is Renoir. Degas has been on too many posters and postcards.

  10. S. Thomas Summers Says:

    interesting. i wish i could have seen this poetic play. i’m not surprised it wasn’t fully appreciated. hope all is well.

  11. Rehan Qayoom Says:

    Thank You for such a fascinating blog! Tony Harrison is my favourite poet -

  12. johemmant Says:

    Thanks all, yes Christine, I agree on Vuillard and Bonnard, wonderuful, and I’m not big on Renoir, for same reasons. Hello Scott (the other one), and hello Rehan, I will be by to check out your site tomorrow, and I agree, he’s a wonderful poet….if you get the chance, go see Fram, I really recommend it.

  13. Childlife Says:

    I loved what you said about viewing the Monet in the context of its day… adds another layer of beauty to the art.

    (And you made me laugh out loud with your comment on the portraits of patrons! :D )

Leave a Reply